Skip to content
SingleFabric logoSingleFabric

Solutions

Your sector. Your problem. The governed answer.

Every sector we serve hits the same four walls — and every wall maps to a verified Mindaeon capability. Choose your sector and read the playbook.

The market

The gap that defines the market.

Enterprises want AI-assisted engineering. Regulated enterprises cannot have it — from a vendor cloud. That gap is the product.

0%

of developers use or plan to use AI tools

Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025

0%

trust the accuracy of AI output

Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025

0%

face company rules banning AI agents outright

Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025

The architecture

Four walls. One architecture.

No cloud jurisdiction allowed

→ Self-hosted. Air-gapped. Any model, including local.

Unverified AI output is dangerous

→ Verification gates as first-class pipeline steps.

Regulators demand evidence chains

→ Hash-chained audit as a compliance product, not a log file.

The knowledge isn't in GitHub

→ An integration hub across the systems enterprises actually run.

The playbooks

Choose your sector.

PLAYBOOK 01 · VP Manufacturing Operations

Industrial & Manufacturing

When unplanned downtime costs millions per hour, unverified AI output is physically dangerous.

  • IEC 62443 (4-1 secure development lifecycle, 3-3 system security)
  • IDTA AAS v3.0 / IEC 63278
  • OPC UA (IEC 62541)
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 02 · Director of Grid Operations

Energy & Utilities

Near the grid, unverified AI output is a blackout risk and a compliance violation in one.

  • NERC CIP-002…CIP-015 (esp. CIP-010 change management)
  • IEC 61850
  • IEEE 1547-2018
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 03 · CMIO / CIO

Healthcare & Life Sciences

PHI in the prompts, FDA-style validation on the changes — cloud AI tools are a breach vector here.

  • HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164)
  • HL7 FHIR R4/R4B
  • ONC HTI-1 (§170.315(b)(11))
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 04 · VP Supply Chain Systems

Supply Chain & Logistics

Serialization deadlines and partner data make unverified AI changes a regulatory liability.

  • FDA DSCSA (21 CFR 581–582)
  • GS1 EPCIS 2.0 / CBV 2.0
  • X12 EDI (204/990/856)
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 05 · VP Engineering / CTO

Enterprise Software & SaaS

AI-assisted velocity without losing SDLC governance — or your SOC 2 evidence.

  • SOC 2 Type I/II (CC8.1 change management)
  • ISO/IEC 27001
  • SLSA
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 06 · CIO / Head of Core Banking Platforms

Banking & Financial Services

AI-authored code you cannot attribute is a regulatory incident, not a convenience.

  • EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689 — GPAI obligations Aug 2025, high-risk Dec 2027)
  • DORA (Register of Information, TLPT, incident reporting)
  • NIS2
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 07 · Group CIO / BSS-OSS Program Director

Telecommunications

The money is in legacy OSS/BSS integration — and no cloud agent can even reach it.

  • EU AI Act (critical-infrastructure and employment AI tiers)
  • NIS2 (24h early warning / 72h notification, management liability)
  • BEREC / EU telecom code
Read the playbook
PLAYBOOK 08 · CIO / CISO of defense agencies

Defense & Public Sector

Vendor-cloud AI tools are not disfavored here — they are architecturally impossible.

  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev.5 (AU, SC, SA, SR families)
  • DoD Cloud Computing SRG
  • EU AI Act deployer duties (Aug 2026 → Dec 2027)
Read the playbook

Your sector not listed? The architecture is the same — tell us about your environment.

See it on your estate, not our slides.

Every playbook ends in evidence: an air-gapped install, a governed change on your tooling, an audit record you can walk. That is the demo.

Book a technical deep-dive